home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Light ROM 4
/
Light ROM 4 - Disc 1.iso
/
text
/
maillist
/
1995
/
0795.doc
/
000629_owner-lightwav…bcom.webcom.com_Thu Jul 27 09:23:10 1995.msg
< prev
next >
Wrap
Internet Message Format
|
1995-08-06
|
2KB
Received: by webcom.webcom.com
(1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA019342190; Thu, 27 Jul 1995 09:23:10 -0700
Return-Path: <owner-lightwave@webcom.webcom.com>
Received: from sage.acti.com by webcom.webcom.com with SMTP
(1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA018682140; Thu, 27 Jul 1995 09:22:20 -0700
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 95 07:26 PDT
Message-Id: <9507270921.AB22832@sage.acti.com>
Received: from acti.com by sage.acti.com; Thu, 27 Jul 95 07:26 PDT
X-Sender: dan@acti.com
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Version 1.4.4
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Length: 757
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: lightwave@webcom.webcom.com
From: dan@acti.com (Daniel J. McCoy)
Subject: Status Report
Sender: owner-lightwave@webcom.webcom.com
Precedence: bulk
Webcom has been experiencing some growth problems. Their server has been
overworked lately. Add to a problem they discovered on Friday, messages
sent last Friday finally found their way to the list. Unfortunately, it
also looks like a great deal of messages were repeated multiple amounts of
times. :( I'll be keeping my eyes open for more of these types of
problems. Webcom has said they have bumped up their plans to replace their
server with something faster and more capable.
Having been around the internet for a while now, it is rather fascinating to
see some ISP startups grow like mad. It's how they handle the growth that
counts. :)
Dan
--
Daniel J. McCoy | djmccoy@primenet.com and dan@acti.com
<a href=//www.webcom.com/~djmccoy/></a>
--
dan@acti.com (Daniel J. McCoy) sent this message.
To Post a Message : lightwave@webcom.com
Un/Subscription Requests To : lightwave-request@webcom.com
(DIGEST) or : lightwave-digest-request@webcom.com
Administrative Items To : owner-lightwave@webcom.com